In case all you think lies below the waters of the Great Lakes are beer bottles and sunken steamers, check into the June 9, 2009 Science Daily article attached below. Recent research has indicated that there are likely specialized caribou hunting camps still much as they were left as the waters of Lake Huron rose over them several thousands of years ago. The camps were located along a ridge that was accessable at a time when the region was climatically dryer and land features now submerged were available for hunting and habitation.
Extensive site structures include stone features that may have been used to direct or corral migrating caribou herds for harvesting as well as stone walls that may have been the foundations of domestic structures. Since higher lake levels have flooded over the ridge-like land form (to a depth of about 100 feet) the site it has not been subject to the typical degradations, such as farming and logging, that all but destroyed other dry land sites. Interestingly enough R.M. Gramly encountered somewhat similar site features at the Vail Site in Maine in 1980 but nothing on the scale of the more recent Great Lakes discoveries. Please read on below. Bill Pickard
ScienceDaily (June 9, 2009) More than 100 feet deep in Lake Huron, on a wide stoney ridge that 9,000 years ago was a land bridge, University of Michigan researchers have found the first archeological evidence of human activity preserved beneath the Great Lakes.
The researchers located what they believe to be caribou-hunting structures and camps used by the early hunters of the period. “This is the first time we’ve identified structures like these on the lake bottom,” said John O’Shea, curator of Great Lakes Archaeology in the Museum of Anthropology and professor in the Department of Anthropology. “Scientifically, it’s important because the entire ancient landscape has been preserved and has not been modified by farming, or modern development. That has implications for ecology, archaeology and environmental modeling.”
A paper about the findings is published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Co-authors are O’Shea and Guy Meadows, director of the Marine Hydrodynamics Laboratories and a professor in the departments of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, and Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences. O’Shea and Meadows found features that they believe to be hunting pits, camps, caribou drive lanes and stone piles used to attract the caribou to the drive lanes. Drive lanes are long rows of rocks used to channel caribou into ambushes. The 1,148-foot structure they believe is a drive lane closely resembles one on Victoria Island in the Canadian subarctic. The hunting formations are on the 10-mile-wide Alpena-Amberley ridge that stretches more than 100 miles from Point Clark, Ontario to Presque Isle, Michigan. The ridge was a bridge between 10,000 and 7,500 years ago when water levels were much lower. Its surface is relatively unspoiled, unlike coastal areas where scientists believe other archeological sites exist. These coastal sites would now be deeply covered in sediment, so they’re often considered lost forever.
Scientists have hypothesized for some time that the ridge might hold signs of ancient occupations. But they didn’t know what signs to look for. O’Shea and Meadows zeroed in on caribou-hunting structures after considering the region’s climate at the time, which would have been similar to the subarctic. Subarctic hunters are known to utilize caribou drive lanes. The U-M researchers then narrowed down where to look for these structures by modeling the lake ridge as it would have been when it was dry. They worked with a Robert Reynolds a professor of computer scientist at Wayne State University to reconstruct the ancient environment and then simulate caribou migrations across the corridor. Based on this, they picked three spots to examine. O’Shea and Meadows used U-M’s new, cutting-edge survey vessel Blue Traveler, sonar equipment and underwater remote-operated vehicles with video cameras to survey these areas. “The combination of these state-of-the art tools have made these underwater archeological investigations possible,” Meadows said. “Without any one of these advanced tools, this discovery would not have happened.” Archaeologist will begin examining these areas this summer.
The Paleo-Indian and early Archaic periods are poorly known in the Great Lakes region because most of their sites are thought to have been lost beneath the lakes. Yet they are also times of major shifts in culture and the environment. The Paleo-Indians were nomadic and pursued big game, O’Shea said. With the Archaic period, communities were more settled, with larger populations, a broad spectrum economy, and new long distance trade and ceremonial connections. “Without the archeological sites from this intermediate time period, you can’t tell how they got from point A to point B, or Paleo-Indian to Archaic,” O’Shea said. “This is why the discovery of sites preserved beneath the lakes is so significant.” Perhaps more exciting than the hunting structures themselves is the hope they bring that intact settlements are preserved on the lake bottom. These settlements could contain organic artifacts that deteriorate in drier, acidic soils on land.
